Written and Directed by Joel Hopkins
A friend of mine has been waiting three weeks to see this movie with me, and last night was our first opportunity. My first inkling of trouble was that we were the youngest women in the theater (I must register my surprise that there were about 20 other people in the theater on a Monday night. If they hadn’t been spread all over the auditorium, I would have imagined it to be a movie outing for the local Senior Center). This was only of passing interest, until half way through the second preview when we all realized that there were significant sound troubles. It occurred to me that as the most sprightly of the audience members, it would only be polite if I went to inform management. Sadly, the poor audio persisted throughout the film, making the dialogue a bit hard to hear. Even more sadly, I’m not sure hearing it at the appropriate volume would have helped.
The title character of the film, played by Dustin Hoffman (regular readers will know that I chronically confuse him with Richard Dreyfuss) is an aging jingle writer. He is becoming obsolete at his job, he has few personal relationships and he’s probably an alcoholic. Harvey has come to London to see his estranged daughter get married. His is a classically sad tale. He’s simply not good enough. He knows he’s not good enough, but he doesn’t do anything to make himself better. I know people like that. Heck, there have been times in my life that I’ve been tempted to be that person. It’s possible Harvey just needs a good anti-depressant….
Arriving in London, we see that Harvey’s ex-wife and her new family (including his daughter, the bride-to-be) have quite happily moved on to life without him. Although they are relatively gracious and kind to Harvey, it is quite obvious that they are making just exactly as much effort towards him as they feel he warrants. They give off an air of self-congratulation… as if to say ‘aren’t we civil? Even Harvey is welcome here’. Harvey picks up on the vibe, bails on the reception, and heads back to New York.
He misses his flight (this poor guy can’t do anything right), and ends up stuck at the airport, where he meets Kate (the always delightful Emma Thompson). Kate works at the airport, and Harvey was actually fairly rude to her earlier in the day. Recognizing her, Harvey convinces her to have a meal with him, and the ‘romantic’ comedy ensues. Now usually at this point in a romantic comedy review, my quotations would be around the word ‘comedy’… because that’s usually where formulaic movies fall short. Between Kate’s overbearing mother (who is terrified of her Polish neighbor, who she fears is a serial killer), and the kid’s table at the wedding reception, there are a couple of actual LOL moments. I never imagined a movie could get the romance part of the formula wrong.
I’ve got to tell ya, I’m not a fan of Harvey (or this movie). It’s a real shame, because I happen to be the kind of critic who believes that Hollywood should diversify and start making movies that aren’t just directed toward the spending habits of teenage boys. I was excited to see a romantic comedy for a woman in her fifties… which is the new 30, haven’t you heard? Clearly the studio did not get the Cougar memo.
So we’ve got a man who is a bit of a personal failure. Harvey gives the clear impression that although he might be having a stretch of bad luck, he’s no stranger to hard times. He has lost his job, screwed up with his family, and missed his flight. And his very first reaction is to have a half dozen shots of whiskey and fancy-talk a pretty younger woman who he was rude to earlier in the day. Seems like Harvey’s one talent might be chasing skirt. He is just charming enough to crack open Kate’s defenses, and he seems to know all the right things to say, for a man who is all alone in life. His most charming feature is that he takes a vivid interest in Kate’s musings and the meanderings of her imagination. I must admit, this is also my personal relationship heroin, so I can see how Kate found him appealing.
He effectively stalks her for an entire day, then convinces her to come to his daughter’s wedding reception. Yep, he gate crashes his daughter’s reception with a complete stranger. Then he interrupts her step-father and insists on making the ‘father’s’ toast to the bride. Turns out everything is about Harvey… and so much for the wishes of the Bride. During his toast he repeatedly references the trials of divorce, which I know is just what every young married couple yearns to hear. Then he ignores Kate at the reception, to the point that she tries to leave. Seriously, this guy is a huge cad… and I’m pretty sure I was the only person in the theater who saw it.
My friend (who is admittedly in her 50s, and tears up at every movie with a happy ending) was sniffling in the seat beside me. And I certainly didn’t hear anyone else muttering ‘you’ve got to be kidding me’ under their breath.
Here’s the trouble: Harvey had all the right words. But I’ve gotta tell ya girls. I’ve been dating for a minute now, and Harvey’s a player. It took me a minute to realize why I left the theater feeling vaguely angry. I looked over to my friend, who is much like Kate. She is an attractive, smart, funny, professional woman. She took good care of her mother, until her passing. My friend is single only because she refuses to date. I promise you, dear reader, that if she was as willing to engage a man as Kate was in this movie, she wouldn’t be single – and neither would Kate. The message of this movie is that a woman in her 50’s can’t find a decent man, so must settle for being treaeted badly by a much older man? Kate gets the predictably happy ending, but I have a feeling that ‘ever after’ is a bit much to ask with a guy like Last Chance Harvey. If you’re looking for a swoopy, crazy romantic comedy between two complete strangers, you’d do a lot better with Harold & Maude or Garden State.
Original Motion Picture Score:
![]()
Fandango
© Copyright 2009
All Rights Reserved. All Wrongs Avenged.





Theodore Roosevelt wrote: ‘It’s not the critic who counts’. His was an ode to the man who does, rather than to the man who sits idly by. Well, Mr. Roosevelt didn’t live in the 21st century, surrounded by 24-hour news media, where ‘multi-tasking’ has evolved past being a Corporate America catch-phrase and is now a life strategy for frazzled soccer moms. We don't have much 'sitting idly' time, and what little we have must be used wisely!